top of page
Search

Innovation

  • Writer: Lily Schworm
    Lily Schworm
  • Jul 14, 2025
  • 1 min read

There has a been a lot of community input about the value of innovation surrounding our agendized "Chief Innovation and Engagement Officer" and our Superintendent Evaluation.  While both of those are closed session items that I cannot divulge, I have significant reservations about the value of innovation and "progress" because the ethics are often ignored.  Just because we can implement change does not mean we should.  I am reminded of I Corinthians 10:23 - "All things are permitted, but not all things are of benefit" (NASB).  Logic and reason require that we concede that progress, change, or innovation are designed to fix a system that's broken or lacking.  While I agree that there is always room for improvement in our public education system, we ought to choose carefully where we put our focus and what we are willing to sacrifice as we implement change.  The system is limited in educational minutes and financial resources, and every change is not an addition, but a replacement.  Let us critically evaluate if the innovation is actually an improvement.

 
 

Recent Posts

See All
Board Self-Evaluation

Although notification has not been posted yet, the Board is scheduled to have a workshop tomorrow from 2-3 PM to discuss and determine the method of our self-evaluation. Board Bylaw 9400 requires tha

 
 
Student Engagement

When I was in the classroom twenty years ago, a movement began towards student engagement to ensure that every learner can access grade-level content. However, this key pillar of Universal Design for

 
 

Paid for by "Lily" Emily Schworm For School Board 2026  FPPC #1477909

bottom of page