top of page
Search

Innovation

  • Writer: Lily Schworm
    Lily Schworm
  • Jul 14
  • 1 min read

There has a been a lot of community input about the value of innovation surrounding our agendized "Chief Innovation and Engagement Officer" and our Superintendent Evaluation.  While both of those are closed session items that I cannot divulge, I have significant reservations about the value of innovation and "progress" because the ethics are often ignored.  Just because we can implement change does not mean we should.  I am reminded of I Corinthians 10:23 - "All things are permitted, but not all things are of benefit" (NASB).  Logic and reason require that we concede that progress, change, or innovation are designed to fix a system that's broken or lacking.  While I agree that there is always room for improvement in our public education system, we ought to choose carefully where we put our focus and what we are willing to sacrifice as we implement change.  The system is limited in educational minutes and financial resources, and every change is not an addition, but a replacement.  Let us critically evaluate if the innovation is actually an improvement.

 
 

Recent Posts

See All
Parental Bill of Rights Committee

Cajon Valley's Parental Bill of Rights (Resolution 08-25-1474 DM) Subsection A mandates the "Creation of an advisory committee or...

 
 
LCAP Year 3 Outcomes

The state of California designed the LCAP to be "a tool for local educational agencies to set goals, plan actions, and leverage resources...

 
 
Charter Schools

Charter Schools have been a hot button topic here in CVUSD as of late.   I have made my convictions known multiple times, but some have...

 
 

Paid for by "Lily" Emily Schworm For School Board 2024  FPPC #1470986

bottom of page